During which period of human prenatal development does the congenital defects occur?

 # During which period of human prenatal development does the congenital defects occur?

A. Period of ovum

B. Period of embryo

C. Period of morula

D. Period of fetus

The correct answer is B. Period of embryo.

Congenital defects can occur during the period of embryo development. This period typically spans from the third to the eighth week after fertilization. It is during this time that the major organs and body systems begin to form, making the embryo particularly susceptible to external factors that can interfere with normal development and result in congenital defects.

What are the three successive prenatal phases in human development?

 # What are the three successive prenatal phases in human development?

A. Period of ovum, embryo, morula

B. Period of embryo, ovum, foetus

C. Period of ovum, embryo, foetus

D. Foetus, embryo, ovum

The correct answer is. C.  Period of ovum, embryo, and foetus.

The three successive prenatal phases in human development are:

Period of Ovum: This phase begins with fertilization, where the sperm penetrates the egg to form a zygote. The zygote then undergoes rapid cell division through mitosis, forming a ball of cells called a blastocyst.

Period of Embryo: During this phase, the blastocyst implants into the uterine wall and undergoes further development. The cells differentiate and specialize, forming the various tissues and organs of the developing embryo. This period generally extends from the third week to the eighth week of pregnancy.

Period of Fetus: This phase starts after the eighth week of pregnancy and continues until birth. The developing organism is now called a fetus. During this period, the organs continue to mature, and the fetus grows in size and complexity until it is ready for delivery.

Who was the first surgeon to devise an obturator for the treatment of cleft palate?

 # Who was the first surgeon to devise an obturator for the treatment of cleft palate?

A. Paul Aegina 

B. Ambrose Pare

C. John Hunter 

D. Norman Kingsley

The correct answer is B. Ambrose Pare. 

Ambrose Pare, a French surgeon in the 16th century, is credited with devising the first obturator for the treatment of cleft palate. An obturator is a prosthetic device used to close the gap in the roof of the mouth caused by a cleft palate, enabling improved speech and feeding for individuals with this condition. Ambrose Pare made significant contributions to the field of surgery and is considered one of the pioneers in the treatment of cleft palate.

Who was against the extraction of teeth for the achievement of stable results?

 # Who was against the extraction of teeth for the achievement of stable results?

A. Martin Dewey 

B. Edward H. Angle

C. Calvin Case 

D. Lawrence Andrews

The correct answer is B. Edward H. Angle.

Edward H. Angle, often considered the father of modern orthodontics, was known for his strong opposition to the extraction of teeth for orthodontic treatment. He believed in the concept of "normal occlusion" and advocated non-extraction treatment approaches. Angle believed that proper alignment and positioning of the teeth could be achieved without tooth extraction, even in cases of crowding or irregularity. 

CHIRANJEEVI DENTAL CLINIC, Boudha-6, Tusal

 Name of Dental Clinic: CHIRANJEEVI DENTAL CLINIC

Address (Full): Boudha-6, Tusal (opposite to kfc)

Year of Establishment: 2078

Name of the chief Dental Surgeon: DR ROJINA SHRESTHA

CONTACT NUMBER: 9849105331

NMC Number of Dental Surgeon: 25557

CLICK HERE TO VIEW ALL DENTAL CLINICS OF NEPAL LISTED PROVINCE-WISE

Examining the Potential for Quackery Among Registered Dentists

Registered dentists play a crucial role in maintaining oral health and providing necessary dental care. They are trained professionals who undergo rigorous education and licensure processes to ensure their competence and adherence to ethical standards. However, like any profession, there is always a risk of a few individuals engaging in unethical practices or quackery. Quackery refers to the promotion of fraudulent or ineffective treatments by individuals falsely claiming to possess medical expertise. This essay explores the potential reasons why registered dentists may engage in quackery and the measures in place to prevent such practices.

1. Lack of Ethical Commitment:

While the majority of registered dentists uphold high ethical standards, a small percentage may prioritize financial gain over patient well-being. The pressure to generate revenue or competition within the dental industry can tempt some dentists to offer unnecessary treatments or recommend unproven procedures for monetary gain. This unethical behavior compromises patient trust and can lead to ineffective or harmful treatments.

2. Limited Regulatory Oversight:

Although dental regulatory bodies exist to monitor and regulate the dental profession, their resources and oversight capabilities may be limited. This can create gaps in monitoring and enforcing ethical standards, allowing a few unscrupulous dentists to engage in quackery undetected. Insufficient regulation can contribute to a lack of accountability, potentially enabling fraudulent practices to persist.

3. Inadequate Continuing Education:

Dentistry is a rapidly evolving field, with new technologies, techniques, and research emerging regularly. Dentists who fail to stay updated on the latest advancements may be more susceptible to resorting to outdated or ineffective treatments. Lack of continuing education can lead to stagnation in professional development and reliance on methods that may not provide optimal patient outcomes.

4. Patient Demand and Misinformation:

Patients often seek quick and inexpensive dental solutions, leading to a demand for shortcuts or miracle treatments. Unscrupulous dentists may exploit this demand by offering unproven or pseudoscientific procedures, capitalizing on patients' lack of knowledge or desperation. Misinformation from unreliable sources or popular trends can further contribute to patient susceptibility to quackery.

Measures to Address Quackery Among Registered Dentists:

1. Strengthened Regulation and Oversight:

Dental regulatory bodies should enhance their monitoring and enforcement capabilities to detect and take swift action against dentists involved in unethical practices. Regular audits, inspections, and mandatory reporting mechanisms can help identify suspicious behavior and protect patients from potential harm.

2. Promoting Continuing Education:

Continuing education programs should be encouraged and incentivized to ensure dentists stay updated on the latest advancements and evidence-based practices. Emphasizing the importance of professional development can discourage complacency and foster a commitment to delivering quality care.

3. Public Education and Awareness:

Efforts to educate the public about oral health, the importance of seeking treatment from qualified professionals, and recognizing the signs of quackery can empower patients to make informed decisions. Increased awareness can help patients distinguish between legitimate dental practices and fraudulent ones.

4. Professional Accountability:

Dental professional organizations should reinforce the importance of ethical conduct and hold their members accountable for their actions. Encouraging peer reporting and establishing mechanisms to address complaints can help identify and address quackery within the profession.

Conclusion:

While the majority of registered dentists adhere to ethical standards and provide high-quality care, the possibility of quackery within the dental profession cannot be completely eliminated. Factors such as financial motivations, inadequate regulation, and patient demand contribute to the potential for unscrupulous practices. However, through strengthened regulation, continuing education, public awareness, and professional accountability, efforts can be made to prevent and address quackery. It is crucial for both dental professionals and patients to remain vigilant, ensuring that dental care is sought from qualified, ethical dentists who prioritize patient well-being and adhere to evidence-based practices. By fostering a culture of integrity and accountability within the dental community, we can collectively work towards safeguarding the trust and health of patients while upholding the standards of the dental profession.

Comparing Fixed Partial Dentures and Dental Implants with Prosthesis: Making an Informed Choice

 When it comes to replacing missing teeth, several options are available, each with its advantages and considerations. Two popular solutions are fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and dental implants with prostheses. Both aim to restore oral functionality and improve aesthetics, but they differ in terms of technique, durability, and overall patient experience. This essay explores the characteristics of FPDs and dental implants with prostheses to help individuals make an informed decision regarding the better option for their specific dental needs.

Fixed Partial Dentures (FPDs):

Fixed partial dentures, commonly known as dental bridges, have been a traditional solution for tooth replacement. FPDs consist of artificial teeth (pontics) held in place by crowns on adjacent natural teeth. They can be made from various materials, including porcelain fused to metal, all-ceramic, or metal alloys. FPDs offer several advantages:

Cost-Effective: FPDs are generally more cost-effective than dental implants, making them a more accessible option for patients with budget constraints.

Non-Invasive: The placement of FPDs involves minimal surgical intervention, as they rely on existing teeth for support. This can be appealing to individuals who are not suitable candidates for invasive procedures.

Quick Procedure: FPDs can be fabricated and placed relatively quickly, providing a prompt solution for replacing missing teeth.

However, FPDs also have some limitations:

Impact on Adjacent Teeth: The preparation of adjacent teeth for crown placement may require the removal of healthy tooth structure. This irreversible alteration can weaken the supporting teeth in the long run.

Bone Loss: FPDs do not stimulate the underlying jawbone, leading to potential bone loss over time. This can affect the overall integrity of the jaw and surrounding structures.

Potential for Complications: FPDs may be prone to complications such as decay, gum disease, and wear on the supporting teeth, which can impact their longevity and require additional dental work in the future.

Dental Implants with Prosthesis:

Dental implants are a modern and advanced solution for tooth replacement. A dental implant consists of a titanium post that is surgically placed into the jawbone, acting as an artificial tooth root. A prosthetic crown, bridge, or denture is then attached to the implant, providing a stable and natural-looking replacement tooth. Dental implants offer several advantages:

Stability and Functionality: Implants provide a stable foundation for prosthetic teeth, allowing for improved biting and chewing capabilities. They closely mimic the function and appearance of natural teeth, enhancing oral functionality and aesthetics.

Preservation of Adjacent Teeth: Unlike FPDs, dental implants do not rely on adjacent teeth for support. This means that neighboring teeth are not altered or compromised in the process.

Longevity and Durability: With proper care, dental implants have the potential to last a lifetime. They are resistant to decay and provide a robust and durable solution for tooth replacement.

However, dental implants also have considerations:

Surgical Procedure: The placement of dental implants involves a surgical procedure, which requires sufficient bone density and healthy gums. Some individuals may not be suitable candidates for implant surgery due to medical conditions or inadequate bone structure.

Time and Healing: The process of dental implant placement and osseointegration (the fusion of the implant with the jawbone) requires time and healing. This may result in a more extended treatment timeline compared to FPDs.

Higher Cost: Dental implants tend to be more expensive than FPDs due to the surgical procedure, implant materials, and customized prosthetic components. This may be a factor for individuals with budget limitations.